⚡ QRO EDITION — 400W+

Magnetic Loop Antennas
The Complete Technical Guide

High-performance small transmitting loop antennas for restricted spaces — physics, construction, RF management, and automation for 400W+ operation.

Compiled by Rael Paster M0RTP  ·  YouTube Presentations

~Q 1000
Typical Q Factor
4,800 V
Cap voltage @ 100W / 7 MHz
3–30 MHz
Practical HF Range
λ/10
Maximum Perimeter
400W+
This guide targets

IntroductionWhy Magnetic Loop Antennas?

Compelling performance from a small footprint — with caveats that demand careful engineering at QRO power levels.

Magnetic loop antennas (MLAs), also called small transmitting loops (STLs), offer a compelling option for amateurs operating from restricted sites — flats, apartments, HOA-restricted properties, or where a discrete antenna profile is required. Unlike electrically small dipoles that suffer severe efficiency penalties, a properly constructed MLA achieves respectable radiation efficiency through an extremely high-Q resonant circuit that concentrates energy in the magnetic field component.

The key trade-off is bandwidth. Q factors of 300–1500 are common, giving 2:1 VSWR bandwidths of 3–15 kHz on 40m. This demands precise, motorised remote tuning. In return, the same narrow bandwidth provides exceptional noise rejection — a significant receive advantage in urban RF environments, where band noise can be 20–30 dB worse than at a rural site.

This guide specifically addresses construction and operation at 400W and above. This places hard demands on every component, particularly the tuning capacitor. Most commercial MLAs top out at 25–150W; QRO operation requires thoughtful engineering decisions throughout the design.

⚡ High Voltage Warning — Read Before Proceeding

At 100W on 7 MHz with a typical Q of 500, capacitor peak voltages exceed 6,800V. At 400W this approaches 14 kV peak. Vacuum variable capacitors are mandatory for 400W+ operation — air variable types will arc and be destroyed. Treat all QRO MLA construction as high-voltage electrical work. Never make adjustments to the capacitor or coupling loop with power applied.

TheoryPhysics & Fundamentals

Understanding the underlying physics is essential for making sensible engineering choices in loop construction.

Radiation Resistance

The radiation resistance of a small loop scales with the fourth power of frequency and the square of loop area:

RR = 3.12 × 10⁴ × (A / λ²)² // Ω — A = loop area m², λ = wavelength m
// At 7 MHz, 1.0m dia (A = 0.785 m²): R_R ≈ 0.075 Ω // At 14 MHz, 1.0m dia: R_R ≈ 1.20 Ω (16× higher) // R_R ∝ f⁴ — doubling frequency multiplies R_R by 16

This steep frequency dependence is why MLA performance degrades sharply on lower bands. A 1m diameter loop is marginal on 80m and essentially unusable on 160m for transmit. For 40m operation, a minimum of 1.0m diameter is recommended — larger is always better within the λ/10 constraint.

Efficiency

Loop efficiency is simply the fraction of total resistance that is radiation resistance. The rest is loss:

η = RR / (RR + RL) × 100%

RL = Rconductor + Rcap_ESR + Rcontacts + Renv_absorption

// Free-space theoretical η for 1.0m Cu tube loop, 7 MHz ≈ 40–60% // Real-world balcony/indoor η typically 7–20% due to environmental absorption

Even 15% efficiency is only −8.2 dB below 100% — roughly 1.4 S-units. In an urban environment where ambient noise is 20 dB above the rural baseline, a loop that is 10 dB down on signal but 15 dB down on noise results in a net signal-to-noise improvement vs a full-size antenna. This is the practical case for urban MLA operation.

Q Factor and Bandwidth

Q = XL / Rtotal = fres / BW−3dB

BWVSWR=2 ≈ fres / (Q/2) // practical 2:1 VSWR bandwidth BWnoise ≈ 2 × BWVSWR=2 // noise receive BW ≈ 2× wider

// Example: Q=800 at 7.1 MHz → BW_VSWR2 ≈ 5.3 kHz, BW_noise ≈ 10.6 kHz
Two distinct bandwidths — do not confuse them

The impedance bandwidth (VSWR ≤ 2) is the retuning interval for transmit. The noise receive bandwidth is approximately twice as wide. When back-calculating efficiency from measured bandwidth, you must use the correct value for the formula. Using the wrong one gives efficiency figures that are 6 dB (one S-unit) over-optimistic — one of DK3BA's core findings.

Skin Effect and Conductor Choice

δ = √(ρ / (π × f × μ₀)) // skin depth in metres
// Copper at 7 MHz: δ ≈ 25 µm — conductor must be much thicker than this // Copper at 3.5 MHz: δ ≈ 35 µm // R_conductor ∝ 1/(d × δ) — larger diameter AND thicker wall both reduce loss

Larger diameter tube always outperforms smaller diameter, but with rapidly diminishing returns. Going from 15mm to 22mm copper tube saves ~1.5 dB; from 22mm to 54mm saves only ~0.6 dB further. 22mm (¾") or 28mm (1") copper plumbing tube is the optimal practical compromise for a fixed indoor/rooftop installation. Silver-plate all connections — contact resistance is a dominant loss mechanism when RR is only 0.1–0.5 Ω.

DK3BA's Five Misconceptions

Manfred Mornhinweg DK3BA published a thorough analysis showing that widely-cited MLA efficiencies are systematically overstated by approximately one S-unit. His key points:

  1. Published efficiencies assume free-space operation. Any nearby lossy material (brick walls, gutters, window frames, wooden floors, wet vegetation) absorbs near-field energy. Indoor loops see 6–10 dB real-world penalty over free-space theory.
  2. Two distinct bandwidths exist — impedance bandwidth and noise bandwidth — and the wrong one is routinely used in efficiency calculations.
  3. Measured Q via NanoVNA → Owen Duffy's back-calculation is the only reliable route to knowing actual efficiency. Theoretical calculations from conductor dimensions alone are optimistic.
  4. Contact resistances compound quickly. Milliohms matter when RR is only 0.1 Ω. Bolted aluminium-to-copper joints, unprepared surfaces, or corroded contacts can consume more power than the loop radiates.
  5. A ground plane or RF screen beneath the loop can recover 3–5 dB on lower bands by reducing near-field absorption into the building structure below.

Capacitor Voltage at Resonance

Vcap,RMS ≈ √(P × Rloop) × Q // simplified approximation Vcap,peak = Vcap,RMS × √2

// 7 MHz, Q=500, R_loop=0.2 Ω, 100W: V_cap_RMS ≈ 4,800V → peak ≈ 6,800V // 7 MHz, Q=500, R_loop=0.2 Ω, 400W: V_cap_RMS ≈ 9,600V → peak ≈ 13,600V // 7 MHz, Q=500, R_loop=0.2 Ω, 1 kW: V_cap_RMS ≈ 15,200V → peak ≈ 21,500V

Capacitor selection rule: Choose a vacuum variable capacitor rated for ≥ 1.5× the calculated peak voltage. For 400W on 40m, minimum 20 kV peak rating. Most ex-Soviet military КПВ types are rated 10–25 kV — check the datasheet for your specific unit.

Practical efficiency measurement: Connect a NanoVNA, tune for lowest SWR, then measure the −3 dB bandwidth. Enter the measured Q (= f/BW) and loop dimensions into Owen Duffy's calculator to derive real-world efficiency. This method accounts for all real losses and environmental effects.

DesignSizing & Calculators

Loop dimensions, band coverage, conductor choices, and online tools.

The λ/10 Constraint

To maintain magnetic loop behaviour (and avoid the antenna acting as a resonant full-wave loop), the perimeter must remain at or below λ/10:

Perimetermax = λ / 10 = c / (10 × f) // metres, c = 3×10⁸ m/s Diametermax = Perimeter / π

// 7.1 MHz: λ=42.2m → max perimeter=4.22m → max diameter=1.34m // 14.2 MHz: λ=21.1m → max perimeter=2.11m → max diameter=0.67m

A 1.0–1.3m diameter loop is the practical optimum for 40m fixed installations, balancing efficiency, physical size, and structural feasibility. Larger is always better within the constraint.

BandFreq (MHz)λ (m) Max Perimeter (m)Max Diameter (m)Practical Choice
160m1.8516216.25.2Impractical
80m3.6838.32.62.0m (very low η)
60m5.356.65.661.81.5–1.8m
40m7.142.24.221.341.0–1.3m ✓
30m10.129.72.970.940.9–1.0m ✓
20m14.221.12.110.670.6–0.9m ✓
17m18.116.61.660.530.5–0.9m ✓
15m21.214.11.410.450.5–0.9m ✓
10m28.510.51.050.330.5–0.9m ✓

Multi-band coverage tip: A 1.0m diameter loop with a 15–1000 pF vacuum variable capacitor covers approximately 40m through 10m. To add 80m, a separate 2.0m diameter loop is more practical than enlarging a single loop — the efficiency difference is significant.

Conductor Material Comparison

Recommended

Copper Tube (22mm or 28mm)

Best practical choice. 22mm (¾") or 28mm (1") plumbing tube is widely available, easily bent, excellent conductivity. Use 1.2mm+ wall thickness for structural rigidity. Silver-plate all joints and capacitor terminals. Avoid flux residue — clean thoroughly after soldering.

Good Option

Wide Copper Strip / Flat Braid

50–100mm wide copper strap offers maximum surface area for a given weight. More flexible than tube. Popular for portable designs. High contact resistance at joins unless carefully clamped or silver-soldered. More prone to RF current crowding at edges.

Portable / Light

Aluminium Tube

~60% the conductivity of copper but significantly lighter. Useful where weight matters. Cannot be soldered — requires compression fittings or stainless clamps. Remove anodising at all RF contact points. Efficiency ~0.5–1 dB worse than copper for same dimensions.

Budget

RG-213 / LMR-400 Coax

The outer braid carries RF current. Inner conductor shorted at one end. Low cost, very flexible. Efficiency roughly 2–3 dB worse than copper tube but adequate for 20m–10m. Limited to QRP/low power — coax outer braid contact resistance rises rapidly at QRO.

Online Calculators

Critical ComponentTuning Capacitor: Air vs Vacuum

The single most important design decision for any loop rated above 150W.

VACUUM VVC coax choke here Main loop 22–28mm copper tube ⌀ 1.0–1.3m for 40m Faraday coupling loop ⌀ ≈ D/5 ⟵ diameter ⟶

MLA schematic — Faraday coupling loop (blue, ≈D/5 diameter) inside main loop (green). Vacuum variable capacitor at bottom. RF choke toroid at coax connection point.

Property Air Variable Capacitor Vacuum Variable Capacitor
Power handling (40m)20–50W before arcing500W–2 kW (type dependent)
Peak voltage rating1.5–3 kV typical5–25 kV standard
ESR / contact lossModerate — plate contactsExtremely low — 0.005–0.02 Ω
Capacitance ratio (max/min)~5:1 to 10:1 (butterfly)50:1 to 100:1 common
Multi-band coverageLimited — narrow ratioExcellent — 40m–10m from one unit
Sensitivity to humidityHigh — arcing risk outdoorsNone — hermetically sealed vacuum
Motor torque requiredLow (light plates)Higher — needs gear reduction
Cost£20–£100 new£50–£300 (eBay ex-Soviet surplus)
Physical sizeLarge for high V/C ratingsCompact cylindrical form
Dielectric stabilityAir: humidity affects tuningVacuum: perfectly stable

Why Air Variables Fail at QRO — The Physics

Air variable capacitors fail at QRO for three compounding reasons:

The conclusion reached independently by every serious builder (including KI5AIF's detailed analysis): Start with the vacuum variable capacitor. Design everything else around it.

Recommended Vacuum Variable Capacitors

US-made 10–25 kV

Jennings CVDD / UCSL / CVDC Series

American-made with well-documented specifications. CVDD-1000 = 15–1000 pF at 10 kV peak — covers 40–10m for a 1.0m diameter loop. CVDC series reaches 25 kV for 1 kW+ operation. Available new from RF Parts; used units on eBay.

eBay Surplus 15 kV typical

Ex-Soviet Military (КПВ / KPV Series)

Abundant USSR military surplus on eBay, typically £40–£100. Common types: 10–1000 pF / 15 kV. Russian datasheets available online. Inspect for physical damage before purchase. Commission at low power first — if the vacuum has degraded you will hear arcing at a few watts.

Commercial Grade

Comet / Voltronics / Meca

Commercial broadcast and RF engineering grade. Very low ESR, precisely characterised capacitance vs shaft-turn curves, defined end-stops. 15–20 kV versions readily available. Premium cost justified for a permanent high-use installation. Voltronics available new from Digi-Key.

Commissioning a New Loop (Power Ramp Protocol)

  1. Connect NanoVNA — verify resonance and measure Q across all intended bands
  2. Transmit at 5W, tune to resonance, confirm SWR <1.5:1
  3. Increase to 25W, 50W, 100W — pause at each level to check for warmth at all joints (IR thermometer is ideal)
  4. At 100W, check capacitor terminals — significant heat means contact resistance; investigate before proceeding
  5. At 200W then 400W — transmit in short bursts (5–10s) initially, monitoring for any SWR instability or arcing sounds
  6. Listen carefully — a faint crackle during transmission indicates incipient arcing in the capacitor or at a connection. Stop immediately and investigate.

Feed MethodsCoupling Options

Three methods to transform the high loop impedance (thousands of ohms at resonance) to 50Ω for the feedline.

Recommended for QRO

Faraday Loop (Inductive Coupling)

A small secondary loop placed inside the main loop acts as the primary winding of a loosely coupled transformer. Most common coupling method — forgiving, adjustable, and DC-isolated.

Dcoupling ≈ Dmain / 5 // starting point // For 1.0m main loop → ~200mm coupling loop // Adjust ±20% to optimise match on lowest band
  • DC isolated from main loop — reduces common-mode complications
  • No electrical contact with main loop required
  • Fine-tune match by adjusting loop diameter or tilting loop axis
  • Position centrally at bottom of main loop (opposite capacitor)
  • Make from coax braid, small copper tube, or heavy wire
Low Loss

Gamma Match

A tap point on the main loop conductor, connected via a series capacitor to the coax centre. Essentially a tapped transformer — very low loss but requires physical connection to the high-voltage main loop.

  • Compact — no secondary loop needed
  • Tap at ~20–30% of circumference from capacitor
  • Series capacitor at QRO must be rated for significant voltage
  • Harder to optimise; breaks DC isolation
Simple / Portable

Hairpin Match

A short shorted stub (hairpin) connected across the capacitor forms an L-network with the feedline. Simple — just a bent piece of wire or copper tube — but narrow-band and requires reconfiguring when changing loop size.

  • Very simple construction
  • Common in portable designs (AlexLoop, AA5TB)
  • Less suitable for fixed multi-band QRO installations
  • Match degrades quickly away from design frequency

For QRO fixed installations: Use the Faraday coupling loop. It maintains complete DC isolation between feedline and main loop, significantly reducing common-mode RF problems, and separates the coupling function from the high-voltage resonant circuit.

RF ManagementRF in the Shack — Coax & Control Cables

At 400W, unsuppressed common-mode RF on the coax outer and RFI from the stepper driver are significant interference sources that must be actively managed.

Why Common-Mode RF is a QRO Problem

A magnetic loop with a Faraday coupling loop is inherently unbalanced when connected to coaxial cable. The intense near-field of the resonating loop induces significant common-mode current on the coax outer conductor. At 400W, circulating loop currents can reach 80–160A — the induced common-mode is proportionally high.

Symptoms of unsuppressed common-mode RF include: SWR meter errors; RF burns from metal chassis; interference on other station equipment; corrupted stepper motor position data; and potentially misleading VSWR readings that mask real antenna problems.

⚡ Choke location is critical — at the antenna, not the shack

An RF choke installed at the shack end of the feedline is largely ineffective. The coax outer has already picked up common-mode RF over its entire run. The choke must be within 30cm of the coupling loop connection — this is where the common-mode current originates. A weatherproof toroid choke at the antenna is mandatory, not optional.

Ferrite Material Selection for HF Chokes

Selecting the wrong ferrite mix for your frequency range produces a choke that appears visually correct but provides 10–20 dB less impedance than expected. The key parameter is resistive (lossy) impedance — not inductive impedance, which is reversible and can store/re-radiate RF.

Mix 31
Best: 1–300 MHz (Broad HF)

The preferred choice for general HF use. High resistive impedance across the entire HF spectrum. If you only buy one type, buy Mix 31. Fair-Rite material #31. Available as FT240-31 toroids and snap-on cores.

Recommended — General HF
Mix 43
Best: 25–300 MHz

Peaks around 25–150 MHz. Excellent for 12m–10m. Significantly less effective than Mix 31 at 3.5–7 MHz. Good if you primarily operate the upper HF bands. Widely stocked at component suppliers.

Upper HF (15m–10m)
Mix 77
Best: 0.1–50 MHz

High permeability — excellent on 160m and 80m. Peak impedance around 1–10 MHz. Less commonly stocked. Type 78 is a useful alternative for 80m/40m focus operations.

Low HF (80m/40m focus)
Mix 61
NOT suitable for chokes

Low loss, high Q material — excellent for inductors and transformers but poor for RF suppression chokes. Low resistive component means RF can pass through. Often sold as a generic "ferrite" — verify mix number.

Do NOT use for chokes

Coax RF Choke Recipes — QRO Rated

Primary Recommendation

Recipe 1 — FT240-31 Wound Choke (1.8–30 MHz, 400W+)

  • Wind 10–12 turns of RG-213 (or LMR-400 for 1 kW+) through a single FT240-31 toroid
  • Achieves >3,000 Ω at 14 MHz, >2,200 Ω at 7 MHz, >900 Ω at 3.5 MHz
  • RG-213 rated for 400W continuous on HF; LMR-400 for up to 1.5 kW
  • Keep turns tight and evenly spaced; secure with self-amalgamating tape
  • Mount toroid in weatherproof enclosure (IP65) if used outdoors
  • The coax passes through the toroid hole — coil the coax around the outside of the toroid
Zchoke ≈ n² × Zmaterial/turn² // impedance scales as turns squared // 12 turns FT240-31: ~3.5 kΩ @ 14 MHz, ~2.2 kΩ @ 7 MHz, ~900 Ω @ 3.5 MHz // K9YC rule: you need >1 kΩ choking impedance minimum
80m / 40m Operation

Recipe 2 — Stacked FT240-31 Toroids for Low-Band Operation

  • Stack 2× FT240-31 toroids aligned, wound with 10 turns through both
  • Impedance approximately doubles vs single toroid — >2,000 Ω at 3.5 MHz
  • Physically larger — ensure appropriately sized weatherproof enclosure
  • Best choice when 80m is a primary operating band with the MLA
Portable / Supplemental

Recipe 3 — Snap-on Cores for Quick Deployment

  • 8–10 × Fair-Rite 0431176451 (Mix 31, 14mm aperture) snap-on cores on RG-213
  • Pass coax through cores with 1–2 short loops through each core
  • Achieves ~1,000 Ω from 1.8–18 MHz — adequate for 100W, marginal at 400W
  • For QRO use Recipe 1 as primary choke; snap-ons as secondary supplemental

RF on Stepper Motor Control Cables

The stepper motor cable runs from the controller in the shack to the motor at the antenna — potentially 5–20m of wire acting as an antenna in the near-field of the loop. At 400W, this cable will pick up significant RF and conduct it back into the controller and transceiver unless specifically suppressed.

Both ends — not just one

A ferrite choke at only one end of the motor cable is insufficient. The cable segment between a single choke and the unprotected end continues to act as an RF antenna. Chokes are mandatory at both the controller output connector AND immediately adjacent to the motor. Measured improvement: ~20 dB noise reduction with proper dual-end chokes vs none.

Motor Cable Choke Specification

Stepper Driver Snubbing

DRV8825 and A4988 stepper drivers generate fast current-switching transients on motor winding outputs. These radiate from the motor leads and conduct back into the power supply. At QRO power levels this causes detectable noise on the received signal:

Reference: K9YC's "A Ham's Guide to RFI, Ferrites, Baluns, and Audio Interfacing" is the definitive ham radio ferrite reference. Available free at k9yc.com/RFI-Ham.pdf

AutomationStepper Motor Control & TF3LJ Controller

Motorised remote tuning is not optional at QRO — the 4–8 kHz VSWR bandwidth on 40m demands sub-kHz precision.

Motor Selection

Standard

NEMA 17 Bipolar Stepper

200 steps/revolution (1.8°/step). Holding torque 40–60 Ncm. Supported by all common drivers (DRV8825, A4988, TMC2209). With 1/16 microstepping and 10:1 gear reduction = ~32,000 steps per capacitor revolution. More than adequate resolution.

Closed-Loop

NEMA 17 + Encoder

Adds rotary encoder on motor shaft for closed-loop position control. The controller can detect motor stall (ice, mechanical jam) and take corrective action or raise an alarm. More complex but essential for unattended outdoor operation.

Gear Reduction

Vacuum variable capacitors require precise, high-torque shaft rotation — often 10–20+ full turns to traverse the full capacitance range. A direct-drive stepper provides insufficient torque on some VVC types and insufficient resolution on all:

Typical configuration: NEMA 17 + 10:1 planetary or 3D-printed spur gear reduction + 1/16 microstepping = ~32,000 effective steps per VVC shaft revolution. At 10 turns total VVC travel = 320,000 steps total. At 7 MHz, frequency resolution per step ≈ 0.02 kHz — excellent.

Best Mechanical Option

Worm Drive

20:1–80:1 reduction, zero backlash, self-locking (the VVC cannot back-drive the motor). Eliminates position drift from vibration during high-power transmission. Harder to source but worth the effort for a permanent QRO installation.

DIY

3D Printed Spur Gear

Print in PETG for best stability. Multiple gear stages can achieve 10:1–20:1 easily. Check for and minimise backlash — it corrupts stored frequency presets. Consider a spring-loaded anti-backlash gear for critical applications.

Simple

Flexible Shaft Coupler

Helical or Oldham coupler absorbs motor-to-VVC shaft misalignment. Use as the final coupling stage after a gear reduction box. Avoid jaw couplers — they have significant backlash that compounds positioning errors.

TF3LJ / VE2AO Magnetic Loop Controller

Loftur Jónsson TF3LJ (also VE2AO) has released an open-source magnetic loop controller that has become the standard choice for serious homebrew automated loops. It implements predictive tuning — the controller knows the capacitor position required for any frequency based on its calibration table, and pre-tunes without any RF transmission required. Frequency presets allow instant band-changes.

TF3LJ Open-Source Loop Controller

Hardware Platform

  • Teensy 3.2 (ARM Cortex-M4, 96 MHz)
  • DRV8825 or A4988 stepper driver
  • Microstepping up to 1/32 step
  • OLED display (128×64, SSD1306)
  • Rotary encoder — manual tuning knob
  • USB for firmware updates and CAT
  • Mechanical endstop inputs

Software Features

  • Predictive tuning — no transmit required
  • 200 frequency/position presets
  • Automatic retune on band change
  • Transceiver CI-V / CAT interface
  • Stepper hold-current control
  • End-stop protection / capacitor protection
  • GNU GPL v3 open source

Supported transceivers: Icom (CI-V: IC-7300, IC-7610, IC-706, etc.), Kenwood (CAT), Yaesu (CAT), Elecraft K3/KX3, and any rig with USB/serial frequency output.

Find the firmware and documentation by searching GitHub for TF3LJ magnetic loop controller or visit TF3LJ's QRZ page. The project has active community support.

Full RFI Isolation Protocol at QRO

At the Motor (Antenna End)

  • Mix 31 snap-on core on all motor phase wires — 3 turns, within 5cm of motor body
  • Motor housing grounded to antenna support mast (not back to shack via cable)
  • Motor bracket printed in PETG/nylon — mechanically isolates motor body from conductive antenna structure
  • Shield grounded at controller end only (cable shield not connected at motor end)

At the Controller (Shack End)

  • Mix 31 snap-on cores on motor cable at controller input connector
  • 100 nF ceramic caps from each motor winding output to ground at DRV8825/A4988
  • 100 Ω resistors in series on each motor winding lead at driver output
  • Optocouplers (PC817 or ADUM1201) on Step/Dir signals from Teensy to driver
  • All control electronics in grounded aluminium enclosure — not an open PCB
  • Separate ±12V linear PSU — not shared with transceiver or SDR

3D PrintingPrinted Parts & Thingiverse

3D printing has transformed homebrew MLA construction. Use PETG or ASA outdoors — PLA degrades in UV and heat.

thing:4024253
QRO Vacuum Capacitor Mount & Housing

Protective housing and mounting bracket for vacuum variable capacitors. Includes strain relief for capacitor terminals and wire management. Print in PETG or ASA for outdoor installations.

→ View on Thingiverse
thing:4542481
K1FM Magnetic Loop Antenna

Complete printable magnetic loop assembly by K1FM. Structural parts, capacitor mount, coupling loop support, and cable management all included. Well-documented build notes with photos.

→ View on Thingiverse
thing:2814184
Magnetic Loop Antenna (3cky)

Compact magnetic loop with printable frame and capacitor mount. Covers 10–20m. Good starting point for a portable design — includes full assembly instructions and BOM.

→ View on Thingiverse
thing:4969518
Modular Loop Coupler (tdanro)

Modular Faraday coupling loop support — adjustable coupling loop holder allowing precise positioning inside the main loop. Essential for multi-band coupling optimisation without dismantling the antenna.

→ View on Thingiverse
thing:6152880
Verloop Coupling System

Faraday coupling with Vernier positioning — fine adjustment of coupling depth without dismantling. Very useful for achieving optimum match across multiple bands from one fixed installation.

→ View on Thingiverse
thing:4175593
Portable MLA "Wild Strawberry"

Lightweight portable design for field use — compact, quick breakdown and reassembly. QRP rated (not for 400W), but an excellent reference design for mechanical structure and coupling loop integration.

→ View on Thingiverse

Material Recommendations

PartRecommended MaterialInfillNotes
Capacitor housing (outdoor)ASA or PETG40–60%ASA superior UV resistance. PETG is acceptable for sheltered outdoor use.
Stepper motor bracketPETG40–50%Must be non-conductive to mechanically isolate motor from loop conductor.
Gear reduction partsPETG or ABS50–70%Higher infill for mechanical load. Target tight tolerances to minimise backlash.
Coupling loop supportPETG25–35%Lightweight. Must be non-conductive — verify filament has no carbon loading.
Controller enclosureNot recommendedUse a metal enclosure (aluminium project box) to contain stepper driver RFI.
Indoor loop parts onlyPLA acceptable20–40%PLA degrades in UV and heat above 60°C — outdoor use not recommended.

Market SurveyCommercial MLA Options

As of 2026, no commercial MLA is rated for 400W+ continuous operation. The QRO niche requires homebrew construction.

AntennaMax PowerFreq Range DiameterApprox PriceNotes
AlexLoop Walkham 25W 7–30 MHz0.90m~$220 Portable, manual tune, Faraday coupling. No motor. Popular for SOTA.
Chameleon F-Loop 2.0 25W SSB / 5W CW 7–30 MHz0.56m~$200 Very compact portable. Bandwidth extremely narrow — requires constant retuning.
MFJ-1786 150W 10–30 MHz0.91m~$450 Motor-driven air variable. Upper HF only. Built-in controller. 150W limit enforced by air cap.
MFJ-1788 150W 7.3–21.4 MHz1.07m~$550 Larger loop covers 40m. Same air cap limitation — 150W is the hard ceiling.
Alpha Antenna MLA 100W SSB 3.5–54 MHz0.91m~$500 Wide claimed coverage with manual tuning. 100W max. Build quality variable.
Ciro Mazzoni Baby Loop 100W 7–30 MHz0.70m~€600 Italian manufacture. 100W limit. Better build quality than MFJ. Premium pricing.
Homebrew (vacuum VVC) 400W–1 kW+ 7–30 MHz1.0–1.5m£200–£500 Vacuum variable + TF3LJ controller + copper tube. Full QRO. This guide.

The QRO gap: Every commercial MLA uses an air variable capacitor, limiting them to 150W maximum. Operating an MFJ-1786 at 400W would destroy its capacitor instantly — the rated voltage is approximately 3 kV; the actual voltage at 400W would be ~13 kV. For 400W+ operation there is no off-the-shelf option. Homebrew with a vacuum variable capacitor is the only route.

M0RTP ResourcesPresentations & Videos

Three video presentations covering MLA theory, construction, and QRO operation by Rael Paster M0RTP.

RSGB 2018 Convention — Magnetic Loop Antennas
Rael Paster M0RTP · RSGB Convention 2018 · Full lecture — foundations, design, and operating
RSGB 2020 Convention Online — QRO Magnetic Loop Antennas
Rael Paster M0RTP · RSGB Convention 2020 (Online) · QRO focus — vacuum caps, RF management, automation
HF Magnetic Loops — QRO Club Presentation
Rael Paster M0RTP · Denby Dale ARS · Detailed QRO build talk — construction, tuning, RF issues

QRZ.com — M0RTP

Full station biography, antenna details, equipment list, awards, and contact information for Rael Paster M0RTP.

→ Visit M0RTP on QRZ.com

Other Presentations

RSGBRSGB Resources

Official RSGB publications, EMC guidance, and technical references.

EMC

RSGB EMC Leaflet 19 — Simple Loop Antennas

Official RSGB EMC guidance document covering magnetic loop antenna installation, common-mode RF management, and interference avoidance. Essential reading for any indoor or restricted-space loop installation.

Download PDF — RSGB EMC Leaflet 19 →

RadCom

RadCom & RadCom Plus

RadCom and RadCom Plus have published multiple technical articles on magnetic loop design and operation. Search the RSGB publications archive for "magnetic loop" or "small transmitting loop" to find a comprehensive reading list covering theory, construction, and operating practice.

RSGB RadCom Archive →

Books

RSGB Antenna Book

Dedicated chapters on electrically small antennas including magnetic loops — theory, construction, and practical operating guidance. Available from RSGB publications. A useful supplement to online resources, particularly for the theoretical treatment.

RSGB Publications Shop →

EMC

RSGB EMC Committee

Authoritative guidance on RFI management for all antenna types — particularly relevant for indoor MLA installations in flats or multi-occupancy buildings. Their ferrite choke and cable management recommendations are consistent with K9YC's guidance.

RSGB EMC Resources →